Dragon Age: Origins
Well, I haven't blogged in a while, and the biggest culprit for that has been Bioware's new fantasy RPG, Dragon Age: Origins. Deirdre gave it to me a few weeks ago as an early Christmas present (and vice versa), and I have been playing the hell out of it. I beat it for the first of what will probably be several times with 65 hours of play time, according to the in-game counter (not including saves and restores).
Initially, I had been very cool on the game; fantasy RPGs are not really my favorite genre, though I have fond memories of the Baldur's Gate series. The marketing campaign, which seemed focused on the sex and violence rather than on a strong story, did not really do a good job of convincing me that the game was going to be my cup of tea either. However, reviews were extremely positive for the most part, Bioware is one of the few developers still in my "I will buy anything from them" list, and Deirdre (who had followed the game much longer than I had) was pretty excited about it, so I was cautiously optimistic.
Does the game hold up to the hype? Well, to say the game is flawless would be a mistake; there were parts of the game that were pretty frustrating for me, and the game's plot is not particularly original, but it is superbly written, drawing you into Ferelden and holding you there. Dragon Age may be my favorite Bioware RPG now, and possibly close to my favorite RPG period, though I think it falls short of the Black Isle heyday. If you are at all interested in fantasy RPGs, Dragon Age should be a must-buy, especially if you are willing to put up with some gameplay annoyances for the sake of a good (if not entirely innovative) story with strong characters and a beautifully crafted setting.
As usual, this will be a two-part review, with spoilers behind the cut.
The Good:
I got the "Digital Deluxe" edition of Dragon Age, which comes with some extra downloadable content. Every purchased copy of Dragon Age comes with The Stone Prisoner, but the Digital Deluxe version from Steam comes with a few extra bits (some armor and some other items) as well as Warden's Keep. The Digital Deluxe edition also comes with a set of wallpapers and the entire Dragon Age soundtrack.
The Stone Prisoner was originally intended to be included with the base game but was pushed out when they thought they didn't have enough time to finish it before release. It is an excellent bonus to the game, as Shale, the golem companion you can get in the town it adds, is very tightly integrated into the rest of the game, especially the dwarven kingdom area. Shale has nearly as much dialogue and character interaction scripted as the other companions, and is definitely a useful addition to your team. The new areas this DLC adds will probably add another couple hours of gameplay as well. I'd say it was well worth getting, but if you have a legitimate copy it should be free for you anyway, so there's no reason not to pick it up. If you buy Dragon Age used, however, you will have to purchase it separately; I don't know if it is worth $15 if you do (you're probably better off just buying a new copy from Steam or something instead, since I doubt you'll get Dragon Age for less than 25 dollars used for a while).
Warden's Keep is much more self-contained than The Stone Prisoner; it adds a single new area for the game, which is basically a dungeon that will take you an hour or two to complete. It also adds a number of very good items (the best sword in the game and some very good armor for the level you happen to get it at), as well as a "party chest," something that really should have been included in the game to start at your camp, and not at a static location (there is in fact a mod to do just that already, so the DLC is not necessary for that). Seven dollars is a pretty reasonable price for what you get. I'm not sure I like the way that Bioware is trying to get you to buy the content for this one (see the Penny Arcade on the topic) but because it was already included in my version it didn't really affect me. I do hope that future DLC is much more like The Stone Prisoner, however, and integrates into the rest of the game rather than just being a bit awkwardly bolted on. I'm not holding my breath though, since that's a lot more work (which is reflected in The Stone Prisoner's significantly higher price tag).
The extra items in the Digital Deluxe edition are handy, but not necessarily all that. There are items in the game that you can find or purchase from merchants that are easily almost as good (though I admit the Blood Dragon Armor does look pretty badass). Don't feel like they are must-haves.
Initially, I had been very cool on the game; fantasy RPGs are not really my favorite genre, though I have fond memories of the Baldur's Gate series. The marketing campaign, which seemed focused on the sex and violence rather than on a strong story, did not really do a good job of convincing me that the game was going to be my cup of tea either. However, reviews were extremely positive for the most part, Bioware is one of the few developers still in my "I will buy anything from them" list, and Deirdre (who had followed the game much longer than I had) was pretty excited about it, so I was cautiously optimistic.
Does the game hold up to the hype? Well, to say the game is flawless would be a mistake; there were parts of the game that were pretty frustrating for me, and the game's plot is not particularly original, but it is superbly written, drawing you into Ferelden and holding you there. Dragon Age may be my favorite Bioware RPG now, and possibly close to my favorite RPG period, though I think it falls short of the Black Isle heyday. If you are at all interested in fantasy RPGs, Dragon Age should be a must-buy, especially if you are willing to put up with some gameplay annoyances for the sake of a good (if not entirely innovative) story with strong characters and a beautifully crafted setting.
As usual, this will be a two-part review, with spoilers behind the cut.
The Good:
- As usual with Bioware RPGs, the writing in this game is excellent, even if the story and characters are not entirely original. Shamus Young has posted a good article on this subject on the Escapist (here's his note on his blog about it), and I agree with most of his points, but Dragon Age feels like it steps beyond the writing in Mass Effect and Knights of the Old Republic to me. There's a few specific cases I'll note later, but in general, characters have much deeper and complex motivations and your actions have more consequences. NPC banter is great to listen to and even more than Mass Effect, I'm disappointed I can only bring a few characters with me in any one place.
- As in Mass Effect, the background material for the game is extensive and the world building in the game is well-done. One minor issue is that the Codex now gets some quest-specific entries instead of just optional background material; if you don't read some of the Codex entries, you can miss out on fairly important or at least helpful game information. The various cultures seem fairly well thought out and most seem like more than just usual fantasy tropes or historical analogues, though there's a fair share of those too. Ferelden is clearly a sort of "not-Britain" and Orlais "not-France," but elves are not exactly nature-loving, immortally wise tree-huggers and dwarven culture, while bearing some surface similarities to Tolkien-esque tropes, is quite different under the surface.
- If you like romance subplots, but inwardly groan when you think back to some of Bioware's previous attempts, especially for female PCs, Dragon Age will probably be a pleasant surprise. There's a wide range of possibilities, and the "good guy" romance option is not nearly as angst-ridden as say, Carth in KotOR or Kaidan in Mass Effect. Unlike in Mass Effect, where I wasn't really that interested in any of the love interests, the romance subplot in Dragon Age actually made a difference to how I played the game, including a few key choices I had to make.
- Dragon Age's tutorial-style origin stories are a great evolution of Mass Effect's "your origin affects the game" idea. While in Mass Effect that simply changed a few NPC lines of dialogue and gave you a new mission or two, in Dragon Age it changes the entire way you play the first hour or so of the game, and touches almost every part of how some NPCs interact with you. Many of the subplots in the various parts of the game are much more meaningful if you have played through the origin story related to them. This adds a lot to replay value, even if it largely only affects the dialogue and not necessarily the main thrust of the story.
- Dragon Age uses the "few major locations on a world map" style of Fallout and KotOR rather than the "few major locations with a bunch of shallow optional stuff in between" of Mass Effect, which seems to make for a much stronger game. I don't think I ever found myself searching for subplots as in Mass Effect; even though there's plenty of quests to do not specifically related to the main plot, most of them take place in areas you will have to visit anyway.
- Dragon Age does a good job of making you and your companions feel like some serious badasses. From time to time -- especially on the boss battles -- your characters will pull of some really awesome finishing moves, and the cinematics that punctuate the major victories in the game are pretty jawdropping.
- Dragon Age uses a Fallout-style ending sequence where the long-term repercussions of your actions are described after the game is over. These are widely varied -- considerably more than the original Fallout, I think -- and change based both on your actions during the various quests and on your decisions around the endgame (mostly in dialogues).
- The tactics system is pretty neat, and I was able to come up with some decent settings for my characters that let me get a bit more hands off than I was in say, Baldur's Gate. Some characters I could reliably not worry about, but mages especially still needed a fair bit of tweaking in order to ensure that they were being used properly. Still, it was annoying to have to sacrifice other skills for tactics slots (though generally only on non-warrior characters) when you could simply micromanage everything if you wanted to. Making people sacrifice abilities in game to compensate for the interface is rarely a design feature people appreciate.
- The game seems very modable, with Bioware having released the toolkit, and there's already wide variety of mods available to change everything from allowing you to respecialize characters to one that lets you make custom equipment to one that removes helmets from view (as in Mass Effect) with varying success. Hopefully this means the game will have a good deal of longevity and we might even see some fan-made campaigns.
- As is usual for Bioware, the soundtrack for Dragon Age is quite good; thankfully, it is in the line of their previous work for Baldur's Gate and not the Marilyn Manson in the trailers. I don't think it's quite as good as the Mass Effect soundtrack, but there's some tracks from it that are sticking with me, and it's entered my rotation of good fantasy soundtracks.
- The difficulty curve for Dragon Age has been described as a "sawtooth"; you will cut a swath through a horde of ravening darkspawn for a while, and then you will get into a boss battle or a "puzzle battle" (where the battle becomes a thousand times easier if you can figure out the one tactic that works best) that ends in a gory end for your entire party, resulting in some reloading to figure out how to win. This was definitely my experience; I'm not particularly fond of boss battles in general, but there's a few that were incredibly frustrating to the point where I needed to take a break.
- Compounding the last issue is that the computer does not do a very good job of leveling up your companions when they join your party. As is usual in many games, being specialized is far more powerful than being a generalist in Dragon Age, but pre-leveled characters generalize, making them much weaker than they could be. If you get your "main companions" early on, this isn't as big an issue, but it can be annoying. Morrigan, for instance, has the Shapeshifter specialization to start with, which is considerably less useful than the other three specializations, an issue when you can only pick up two mages to choose from in the game at all. I am using a mod that allows you to respecialize characters and I highly recommend that for people playing on the PC.
- Magic, and particularly some of the spell combinations, seems really overpowered. Fights that are nearly impossible without spells like Cone of Cold or Crushing Prison suddenly become far easier with them. Prior to the last rebalancing patch, it was possible to completely lock down some of the bosses with repeated uses of stunning/paralyzing spells for the entire duration of the fights. I have heard of some people playing without mages at all, but I'm a bit surprised that's viable.
- Equipment overload is not as bad as in Mass Effect, but it is still a bit annoying that I am funding my world-saving quest by selling scavenged armor, and juggling my inventory was a serious pain during a few of the longer quest periods, such as in the forest ruin or the Deep Roads. It isn't as bad as Mass Effect because it's much clearer what is generally better to use, but it's still a bit of a pain. I really hope RPGs move away from this kind of loot mechanic in the future. As an important tip, whenever backpacks are available at a shop, buy them as soon as possible. The ten extra inventory slots will pay you back in pretty short order.
- Only being able to take three companions was a bit frustrating. You generally need to take a tank (usually a sword and shield fighter), having a rogue to disable traps and open chests is a good idea (if not absolutely necessary), and you're probably going to want at least one mage for healing and/or crowd control with area-of-effect spells (and two is even better). There's only two mages and two rogues in the game, and the rest are all basically fighters. That really limits the options for a well-rounded party, especially when you want to bring certain party members with you on quests of special relevance to them. Even just being able to have one more person would have made the game far easier to manage, and a wider variety of companions would have been welcome too. As it is, I settled on the team of Alistair (a sword and shield fighter), Leiliana (a bowfighting rogue), Morrigan (a combat-oriented mage), and myself (a support/combat mage) very early on and rarely deviated; when I had to get rid of my rogue or one of my mages, it was pretty painful. That really limits not only your strategies but also the banter and character subplots you can be involved with, which was really disappointing. If you aren't a mage, you have even fewer choices, it seems.
- If you don't have much in the way of healing magic (and sometimes even if you do), many of the tough battles can boil down to bringing as many healing/mana potions as you can and chugging them like crazy. Personally, I'd prefer fewer battles where this was the rule.
- There's a fair bit of annoying mook fights, necessitating that you fight through waves of darkspawn, or cultists, or some other generally-annoying-but-not-that-tough guys to get to the main set-piece battles. Some of these are genuinely tough, simply because of the number of enemies you have to fight (many of which are archers or mages, which can be really a pain). This can cause some serious slowdowns in the game's pacing, and doesn't do great things for the verisimilitude since for the most part they are just guys standing around waiting to fight you, with no other real reason to be there. This is, unfortunately, a staple of a lot of RPGs (Mass Effect's final stages are another example), but there needs to be some more thought applied to the level design to avoid this kind of annoyance.
- The blood effects are a bit extreme. It's not a giant complaint, but it's a little weird to see a cut scene where you're talking with someone calmly while you're covered head-to-toe in blood spatter. The game wouldn't really lose much if this was toned down (or even turned off, as you can do).
I got the "Digital Deluxe" edition of Dragon Age, which comes with some extra downloadable content. Every purchased copy of Dragon Age comes with The Stone Prisoner, but the Digital Deluxe version from Steam comes with a few extra bits (some armor and some other items) as well as Warden's Keep. The Digital Deluxe edition also comes with a set of wallpapers and the entire Dragon Age soundtrack.
The Stone Prisoner was originally intended to be included with the base game but was pushed out when they thought they didn't have enough time to finish it before release. It is an excellent bonus to the game, as Shale, the golem companion you can get in the town it adds, is very tightly integrated into the rest of the game, especially the dwarven kingdom area. Shale has nearly as much dialogue and character interaction scripted as the other companions, and is definitely a useful addition to your team. The new areas this DLC adds will probably add another couple hours of gameplay as well. I'd say it was well worth getting, but if you have a legitimate copy it should be free for you anyway, so there's no reason not to pick it up. If you buy Dragon Age used, however, you will have to purchase it separately; I don't know if it is worth $15 if you do (you're probably better off just buying a new copy from Steam or something instead, since I doubt you'll get Dragon Age for less than 25 dollars used for a while).
Warden's Keep is much more self-contained than The Stone Prisoner; it adds a single new area for the game, which is basically a dungeon that will take you an hour or two to complete. It also adds a number of very good items (the best sword in the game and some very good armor for the level you happen to get it at), as well as a "party chest," something that really should have been included in the game to start at your camp, and not at a static location (there is in fact a mod to do just that already, so the DLC is not necessary for that). Seven dollars is a pretty reasonable price for what you get. I'm not sure I like the way that Bioware is trying to get you to buy the content for this one (see the Penny Arcade on the topic) but because it was already included in my version it didn't really affect me. I do hope that future DLC is much more like The Stone Prisoner, however, and integrates into the rest of the game rather than just being a bit awkwardly bolted on. I'm not holding my breath though, since that's a lot more work (which is reflected in The Stone Prisoner's significantly higher price tag).
The extra items in the Digital Deluxe edition are handy, but not necessarily all that. There are items in the game that you can find or purchase from merchants that are easily almost as good (though I admit the Blood Dragon Armor does look pretty badass). Don't feel like they are must-haves.
SPOILERS BEGIN HERE -- DON'T READ ANY FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT STORY DETAILS
Rather than summarize the game's plot as I've done in the past (which doesn't make much sense in retrospect -- if you've played the game you know, and if you don't want to play it, you probably don't care), I'm going to highlight some of the best and worst parts of the game's story to me.
Dragon Age does a good job of portraying a world where there are few purely good and evil characters; nearly every major NPCs and NPC group is made to straddle the line, and when they don't I was genuinely surprised. I, like many people, expected the main villain of the game, Teryn Loghain, to be under the influence of a demon of some sort, which had led to his erratic behavior (which most NPCs seemed to indicate had started only recently). When no such influence appear to be the case, it was really odd how his actions seemed to be a tad extreme for the motivations he had. I'm told those motivations are a bit more clear if you have read the Dragon Age novels (possibly also if you recruit him into your party at the end), but that really shouldn't be necessary.
The standout "shade of gray" part of the campaign is probably the dwarven kingdoms; both the two dwarves vying for the throne are pretty shifty and I'm told this is only more evident if you have played the dwarf origins. I ended up going with Bhelen only because he seemed to be the one more likely to give his assistance to me against the darkspawn, but it wasn't an easy choice. The one thing I will complain about with this part is that I hard a hard time deciding because I really couldn't find out that much about the two candidates even after trying to talk to as many dwarves as I could. Most seemed to support Harrowmont, but it would have been nice if you could discover some of what is evidently revealed in the dwarf origins if you are not a dwarf.
Orzammar is also where you find out some of the creepiest stuff about both the darkspawn (the Broodmother is especially messed up if you are female) as well as the dwarves' golems. It's well worth it to bring Oghren and Shale with you on this part, as they have the most involvement here, but if you intend to side with Branka and create more golems, Shale won't be very happy with you. Honestly, I thought she was pretty clearly a raving loony by this point, so I felt pretty good about backing up Shale (even Oghren didn't seem to broken up about it).
I really liked the conundrum posed by the Circle of Magi/Templar interaction, especially as a mage. At first glance (especially during the mage origin), there's a lot of reasons to feel like the mages are essentially prisoners in a gilded cage, enslaved by the Templars and the Chantry. However, during the return to the Circle later in the game, you definitely come to see the Templar side of things. Some extremism may be justified when a couple bad apples can turn the mage's tower into a portal to Hell (almost literally). I ended up not asking Alistair to take the mages from under the Templars' heel at the game mostly because I sympathized with them at least somewhat.
As I said in the non-spoiler part of the review, I also enjoyed the strength of the romance plotlines in Dragon Age; I realized how much better they were than in Mass Effect or other games when Morrigan was actually able to manipulate me into her deal at the end of the game by talking about how much Leiliana would miss me if I died in the fight against the archdemon. When NPCs can do that, that's a sign that the romance subplot is more than just a way to inject sex into the game for the sake of pushing the limits. While the Mass Effect romance seemed a bit more salacious and unnecessary, Dragon Age integrates it much more tightly with the game's plotline and natural.
I have to say, the end battle of the game -- against the archdemon -- seemed a bit anticlimactic after the Landsmeet and the toppling of Loghain. Whereas that had a very strong story thread running through it and was so much more than just a bunch of fights, I was disappointed that the end battle was simply a long string of fights against darkspawn and then a battle against a dragon. There was no real confrontation with the archdemon like you had with Flemeth, Loghain, or the other "secondary" villains -- instead of a final confrontation it seemed more like an inevitability. The archdemon lacked any real characterization, which was disappointing given that the major opponents of the various subplots of the game -- the Desire demon in Redcliffe, the Sloth and Pride demons in the mages' tower, the lady of the forest and Zathrain in the Dalish forest, etc, all seemed to have at least some sort of personality to them. The archdemon just seemed like an obstacle, not the most powerful malevolent force to walk the surface of the earth. I hope that the main opponent of the inevitable sequel gets some more character instead of being what seems like almost an afterthought.
That wraps up my thoughts on the game; I'm curious to see what other people think, especially people who chose a different path for their characters, as I was pretty much a goody-two-shoes (as usual) throughout the whole game. Despite the flaws I mention, I think Bioware has still made one of the best RPGs I've seen, and I'm really looking forward to their next effort.
Rather than summarize the game's plot as I've done in the past (which doesn't make much sense in retrospect -- if you've played the game you know, and if you don't want to play it, you probably don't care), I'm going to highlight some of the best and worst parts of the game's story to me.
Dragon Age does a good job of portraying a world where there are few purely good and evil characters; nearly every major NPCs and NPC group is made to straddle the line, and when they don't I was genuinely surprised. I, like many people, expected the main villain of the game, Teryn Loghain, to be under the influence of a demon of some sort, which had led to his erratic behavior (which most NPCs seemed to indicate had started only recently). When no such influence appear to be the case, it was really odd how his actions seemed to be a tad extreme for the motivations he had. I'm told those motivations are a bit more clear if you have read the Dragon Age novels (possibly also if you recruit him into your party at the end), but that really shouldn't be necessary.
The standout "shade of gray" part of the campaign is probably the dwarven kingdoms; both the two dwarves vying for the throne are pretty shifty and I'm told this is only more evident if you have played the dwarf origins. I ended up going with Bhelen only because he seemed to be the one more likely to give his assistance to me against the darkspawn, but it wasn't an easy choice. The one thing I will complain about with this part is that I hard a hard time deciding because I really couldn't find out that much about the two candidates even after trying to talk to as many dwarves as I could. Most seemed to support Harrowmont, but it would have been nice if you could discover some of what is evidently revealed in the dwarf origins if you are not a dwarf.
Orzammar is also where you find out some of the creepiest stuff about both the darkspawn (the Broodmother is especially messed up if you are female) as well as the dwarves' golems. It's well worth it to bring Oghren and Shale with you on this part, as they have the most involvement here, but if you intend to side with Branka and create more golems, Shale won't be very happy with you. Honestly, I thought she was pretty clearly a raving loony by this point, so I felt pretty good about backing up Shale (even Oghren didn't seem to broken up about it).
I really liked the conundrum posed by the Circle of Magi/Templar interaction, especially as a mage. At first glance (especially during the mage origin), there's a lot of reasons to feel like the mages are essentially prisoners in a gilded cage, enslaved by the Templars and the Chantry. However, during the return to the Circle later in the game, you definitely come to see the Templar side of things. Some extremism may be justified when a couple bad apples can turn the mage's tower into a portal to Hell (almost literally). I ended up not asking Alistair to take the mages from under the Templars' heel at the game mostly because I sympathized with them at least somewhat.
As I said in the non-spoiler part of the review, I also enjoyed the strength of the romance plotlines in Dragon Age; I realized how much better they were than in Mass Effect or other games when Morrigan was actually able to manipulate me into her deal at the end of the game by talking about how much Leiliana would miss me if I died in the fight against the archdemon. When NPCs can do that, that's a sign that the romance subplot is more than just a way to inject sex into the game for the sake of pushing the limits. While the Mass Effect romance seemed a bit more salacious and unnecessary, Dragon Age integrates it much more tightly with the game's plotline and natural.
I have to say, the end battle of the game -- against the archdemon -- seemed a bit anticlimactic after the Landsmeet and the toppling of Loghain. Whereas that had a very strong story thread running through it and was so much more than just a bunch of fights, I was disappointed that the end battle was simply a long string of fights against darkspawn and then a battle against a dragon. There was no real confrontation with the archdemon like you had with Flemeth, Loghain, or the other "secondary" villains -- instead of a final confrontation it seemed more like an inevitability. The archdemon lacked any real characterization, which was disappointing given that the major opponents of the various subplots of the game -- the Desire demon in Redcliffe, the Sloth and Pride demons in the mages' tower, the lady of the forest and Zathrain in the Dalish forest, etc, all seemed to have at least some sort of personality to them. The archdemon just seemed like an obstacle, not the most powerful malevolent force to walk the surface of the earth. I hope that the main opponent of the inevitable sequel gets some more character instead of being what seems like almost an afterthought.
That wraps up my thoughts on the game; I'm curious to see what other people think, especially people who chose a different path for their characters, as I was pretty much a goody-two-shoes (as usual) throughout the whole game. Despite the flaws I mention, I think Bioware has still made one of the best RPGs I've seen, and I'm really looking forward to their next effort.
Categories
Games0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Dragon Age: Origins.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.wraithwerks.net/mt/mt-tb.cgi/159
I recently started playing "Dragon Age". I'm ... less positive ... about it than you. Perhaps I'm just not grocking the tactics mechanics, but I constantly find my characters ignoring my instructions. It's got to the point where I have turned all tactics off.
I just about fell out of my chair laughing when Boobsy McLivesintheWood ... sorry, "Morrigan" ... turned up in her fantasy bikini. I swapped her out for Wynne as soon as I was able.
I've so far played through the intro, Wilds, and Lothering sections, and rescued Connor from the demon in Redcliffe, but not saved his father yet. I've also cleansed the Circle tower. The "Lost in the Fade" series of adventures are so far the only part of the game I would point to as "good gameplay".
I'm now in Orzammar, where I backed Harrowmont rather than Bhelen. Honestly, this is a section that is really annoying me - there's this stuff about how Bhelen framed his elder brother and got him exiled and if that happened in a tabletop game I'd be "right, let's prove it and get the exiled brother reinstated", but there doesn't seem to be any scope for it in this.
Well, in the last few months I must admit that I've come to the conclusion that I really don't like the RPG mechanics that are so much at the fore of Dragon Age -- the inventory and the very fiddly tactical combat (though I don't think I had problems nearly as bad as you). If I hadn't played Mass Effect 2 so soon after, I think these would have been less obvious, but Mass Effect 2 really just hit the sweet spot for me.
I admit that Morrigan's outfit is pretty ridiculous, but she is a surprisingly interesting character if you actually get to know her (as most of them are). And Orzammar, I'm told, is MUCH more interesting if you played through one or both of the dwarf origin stories.
However, I still think Dragon Age is pretty good, if you are more tolerant of the combat (and enjoy it, which many people do). And there are several points in Dragon Age which really stuck with me (Shale in the Deep Roads, for one). However, I think Mass Effect 2 is the stronger all-around game in retrospect -- and I haven't picked up the expansion for Dragon Age or played it more than once all the way through, but I've already beaten ME2 twice, and look forward to my second time.
I've largely got over the tactics issues. Not completely - the characters still sometimes do weird stuff - but largely.
I'm finding myself less frustrated since leaving Orzammar. I've completed that section, and my first visit to the capital, and I am now doing the Dalish elves section. I've hooked up permanently with Leliana, after dalliances with Morrigan and Zevran. The other two just because I could :)
Leliana, Wynne and Oghren are my solid group. I haven't switched anyone else in or out since I got that line-up.
Re: ME2. I have both ME games but have not played either - it was recommended to me that I play DA first, as ME2 was so much better.
Orzammar is very long and has a lot of parts where you're just slogging through tons of enemies -- not the most rewarding action in my opinion. On the other hand, the politicking and choices you have to make there are very poignant. It's the most obvious case where there's no real good or bad decision. Unfortunately, it's hard to see that if you haven't played through the dwarf origins, or when you have to put up with a mind-numbing dungeon slog with a couple of the hardest fights in the game.
When you play ME, keep in mind that ME2 is a significant change from ME1; ME1 has a lot of annoyances (find my review and you should get a good rundown), but ME2 fixes almost all of them. Regardless, both are good, and you get a lot more out of ME2 having played through ME1 and imported a character.
For me, a big problem with DA is that Orzammar is far from the only tedious "grind" in the game. Far too many areas are set up as "open a door, kill some monsters, open a door, kill the same monsters, open a door ...". I just went through the ruined temple at Haven and it was the same thing.
I understand the desire to put lots of content in the game, but there's content and there's content. A lot of DA feels like padding to drive up the number of hours the game takes to complete ... while at the same time making it almost certain I will never play it again once I finish it.
I played through the Dwarf Commoner origin last night. It actually makes Orzammar worse. Your sister is Bhelen's lover and has born him a child - so supporting him becomes the obvious thing to do. And you're stuck with exactly the same quests (after the first one) and inevitable battles. This is especially irritating with the Jarvia quest. If I'm playing my dwarf as a nasty thug who joined the Wardens just to save his skin, why don't I have the option to tell Jarvia she can work for me or die, and have that be a meaningful offer? I'd have happily exchanged a bunch of dungeon crawls for the chance to actually make real decisions, beyond that of which NPC model will be in the soft core cut scenes.
ME1 vs ME2: Yeah, other people have told me that. I shall persevere through the first one in hopes that the second will live up to the hype.